Investor jitters over the AI boom are growing, and OpenAI’s finances are Ground Zero. The company’s $1.4 trillion commitment to future compute spending has become a glaring red flag, raising concerns that the industry is inflating a massive bubble. This anxiety is palpable, driving market nerves and putting OpenAI executives on the defensive as they try to justify spending that dwarfs their current income.
The tension boiled over publicly when CEO Sam Altman had an awkward confrontation with investor Brad Gerstner. On a podcast, Gerstner pointed to the vast gap between $1.4 trillion in costs and the company’s annual revenue. Altman’s terse “enough” and his suggestion that Gerstner could sell his shares did little to soothe market fears about the company’s financial footing.
Adding fuel to the fire, OpenAI’s CFO Sarah Friar recently suggested an “ecosystem of banks, private equity, maybe even governmental” support could help finance the chip spending. The implication of a government backstop for a $500bn company triggered immediate clarification attempts. Friar took to LinkedIn to deny seeking a federal backstop, while Altman insisted taxpayers should not be on the hook for “bad business decisions.”
The controversy highlights OpenAI’s unique and precarious position. As tech analyst Benedict Evans notes, OpenAI is trying to match the infrastructure spending of giants like Meta, Google, and Microsoft. The difference is that those companies have hugely profitable existing businesses to pay for their AI ambitions. OpenAI does not, so it’s “trying to bootstrap its way into the club,” resulting in complex and circular-looking deals with partners like Oracle and Nvidia.
For now, OpenAI remains a loss-making entity. While it refutes specific reports of its losses (such as $12 billion in a single quarter), it doesn’t deny it’s in the red. The entire $1.4 trillion bet rests on the belief that its brand, 800 million weekly users, and future, unproven products can generate enough revenue to pay the bill. The question hanging over the market is whether this belief is visionary or the definition of a bubble.